[Speaker 1] For example, as you told that if the textbook says or the AI says that DVT prophylaxis was a known, has had to be given and we did not give. But at the same time, if the AI or the textbook says that non-union is a known complication of this fracture and he goes and reads it, still that basically can be a defense?
[Speaker 2] Yes, it is defense because in court of law, what is needed to convince a judge is naturally expert opinion of some other doctor or could be a books' references. Because ultimately they need some evidence to give a judgment. If book says this is a possible complication and which was explained to the patient and also been treated thereafter. What could be the outcome, it is not important, but at least care has been given, then doctor has got a very good defense in that domain. So that books' references can be shown. AI, yes, it is not all accepted because being a [inaudible], anyone can put their own opinion. But book references has got its own importance which has still been taken as a very good evidence in the court of law.