[Speaker 1] We all know that in a diabetic patient or in a patient who has multiple comorbidities, diabetes or maybe some kind of partial liver failure, partial kidney failure, there is a very high chance that they will, there is a little bit compared to the normal population, there is a high chance. We do all the explanation and then still the patient gets infected. Would we have not operated on the patient would have been better? Or would we have operated on the patient and then he faces that infection and then has a long complication and then eventually succumbs to infection. What should we do? That is somewhere where I am always dicey whether to operate or not, especially in the fractures.
[Speaker 2] See, I'll tell you, you need to take a best choice for saving a life, for saving a patient from some trauma and giving a relief. You have chosen some part to relieve that. You will never be held liable because it is a duty of a doctor to assess and then decide about the process procedure. In comorbidity patient, if patient has suppressed about morbidity and because of that many of the time we don't do basic investigations also or in emergency we skip the things. Then definitely safeguarding are there, but it is advisable as a due care for any procedure to do basic investigation, where blood sugar and of course basic investigation with fitness are required. In that cases, if you choose that in spite of having high diabetes but if I don't do a surgery, there could be a possible loss of life or could be a major complication. Then by controlling diabetes you can definitely go ahead or taking care of comorbidities you can definitely get and if some untoward incidents do happen, then if it is documented properly prior to that, you can safeguard yourself.