[Speaker 1]: Is C-arm a compulsory thing in today's orthopedic surgery or it's okay and it can be defended easily that it was not a compulsory thing in the court of law. What does the law say about it?
[Speaker 2]: In here very clearly law has settled that part and I still remember the judgement where I got a benefit of that judgement in one of the case where I argued only because of that particular part in case of remote area where patient died because of the loss of blood and blood bank was very far away. I got a discharge of the doctor in that. I argued the matter. But the judgement very clearly says that facility available at particular place, at particular time, need to be considered for filing a case against doctor or deciding about negligence against the doctor. So facility available at particular place at particular time need to be considered is very clear on that. So in remote area there is a quite possibility that facility is not available. And because of that if at all some untoward incident has happened, doctor can be safeguarded. But yes if at all facility can be given to the patient, it can be added advantage to that. But there is nowhere it is made a mandatory that something is required which is generally required is with every hospital. Advanced technology may may not be available and is not going to impact the result, then you can defend yourself in court of law very easily.
[Speaker 1]: Okay.