[Speaker 1]: Many times there is a self injury. Basically a person driving a bike had a ligament tear, comes to me after two weeks, gets an MRI done. We are posting him for surgery. There is no medico-legal case because though he was driving a bike, though it was a road traffic accident, but there was nobody at fault. His bike slipped, he got an accident or basically whatever. And in that case, is an undertaking, like the insurance companies are now accepting the undertaking that that there was no foul play, that is why this is how the injury happened and that is why the medico-legal case was not done or police was not notified. Is that acceptable?

[Speaker 2]: No. Because you said that insurance companies are accepting, I have got multiple cases where because of only this ground, insurance has been rejected by the insurance company, saying that no MLC was done. Secondly, many of the time I've found that ki even with a self accident, the insurance claim gets opened in accidental tribunal because every bike has got their own insurance which save the driver and other people and all. In case where advocate files the case with accident tribunal for this particular guy, again, for getting that compensation, MLC is going to play a vital role. So it is advisable to every single doctor, not only for their own safety, for the safety of the patient and their future, better to intimate. Now, there he can give a statement or undertaking. Because police will come, he need to give his statement, and in that undertaking he can give it is because of me and the file is going to get closed. There is no criminal offence per se, and they can close that particular inquiry. But for our safety it is needed because we don't know what is going to happen in future. Today a patient may have lied to us and tomorrow, reality could be something else, and that can really cause a big trouble to my doctor because I've got lots of cases where criminal cases has been filed against this guy and later my doctor was troubled for that.